Make
Formula, scent, mold, batch, cure, and available quantity.
Sample deliverable · Find the Friction
A worked example showing how Contempo turns a recurring business burden into a visible workflow, ranked friction, and one bounded recommendation.

Maid for Clean is an affiliated operating microbusiness with a public storefront and real product work. This document demonstrates the structure and judgment of a Contempo audit. Friction rankings, timing, and the recommended implementation remain hypotheses until validated through an owner interview and baseline observation.
Executive summary
The seasonal launch process appears to require the same product facts to be translated repeatedly into labels, listings, announcements, customer answers, and fulfillment notes. The first useful improvement is not autonomous marketing. It is one approved product record that safely feeds every downstream draft.
Capture the product truth once, verify readiness, then prepare channel-specific materials from that controlled source.
Current-state map
Interview prompt: confirm who owns each step, where the record lives, and which exceptions create rework.
Formula, scent, mold, batch, cure, and available quantity.
Name, size, ingredients, price, claims, warnings, and SKU.
Photography, label, product page, social copy, and announcement.
Questions, inventory changes, orders, exceptions, and follow-up.
Friction register
| Friction hypothesis | Business effect | Priority | Evidence to collect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product facts live across notes, labels, photos, and memory. | Repeated entry and inconsistent wording. | High | Count sources consulted during one launch. |
| “Ready to publish” has no single visible definition. | Missing price, warning, image, inventory, or fulfillment detail creates delay. | High | Record corrections and launch-day interruptions. |
| Each channel begins from a blank page. | Creative attention is spent reformatting established facts. | Medium | Time one listing, one email, and one social draft. |
| Common questions are answered repeatedly. | Owner interruptions increase during active promotions. | Medium | Tag incoming questions for two launch cycles. |
| Stock and exception language can drift from the storefront. | Customers may receive stale availability or fulfillment guidance. | High | Compare public copy against current stock and policy. |
Recommended first project
Name, SKU, price, inventory, description facts, ingredients, warnings, fulfillment, source images, and owner.
A short checklist prevents publication until required facts, images, labels, and stock are confirmed.
Prepare listing copy, launch email, social drafts, FAQ answers, and internal fulfillment notes from the approved record.
The owner reviews claims, tone, price, images, inventory, and timing before anything reaches a customer.
Illustrative implementation
2–3 weeks · $2,400 fixed scopeOne product-record template, one readiness checklist, five draft outputs, owner approval step, testing with two products, documentation, and handoff.
Separate or excluded
Control boundary
Measurement plan
Minutes from approved product facts to review-ready launch materials.
Changes caused by missing, stale, or conflicting product information.
Customer questions answerable from maintained product knowledge.
Launches reaching the chosen date with required materials complete.
Unexpected launch tasks that displace making or fulfillment work.
Owner-rated clarity about what is ready, missing, and approved.
No savings or performance result is claimed here. Collect one or two baseline launches, then compare the same measures after adoption.
Decision
The owner launches products repeatedly, product facts can be maintained, and review time is available.
Products, pricing, warnings, or fulfillment rules are still changing too quickly to form a dependable source.
The owner can prepare a consistent launch from one approved record without surrendering control of claims, customer promises, or publication.