What we examine
Inputs, handoffs, repeated questions, duplicate effort, missing information, delays, risks, and the moments where only one person knows what to do.
How we help
We begin with the work as it actually happens, choose one valuable improvement, and build a system your people can understand and control.
Offer 01 · $450 flat
A focused diagnosis for owners who know something is too slow, repetitive, scattered, or fragile—but do not need a giant transformation project.
Inputs, handoffs, repeated questions, duplicate effort, missing information, delays, risks, and the moments where only one person knows what to do.
A plain workflow map, ranked opportunities, constraints worth respecting, and one recommended next move with a realistic scope.
Offer 02 · Typically $1,500–$5,000
A bounded implementation around one recurring burden. The scope stays understandable; the outcome stays visible.
Discuss the process →We follow the current process without pretending the unofficial steps do not exist.
We agree on the owner, boundary, success check, review points, and what remains intentionally human.
We check missing information, wrong outputs, unavailable tools, and the recovery path—not only the happy path.
You receive clear instructions, ownership, and a system that can be maintained without ritual knowledge.
Offer 03 · $300–$900 / month
Light stewardship for systems that already create value and need maintenance, refinement, and a known recovery path.
Ask about care →Keep dependencies, instructions, and integrations from quietly decaying.
Use real experience to remove friction rather than adding features for their own sake.
Know what happens when a tool fails, a person changes, or the workflow needs to move.
The buying path
No discovery maze and no surprise proposal. The next step should always be visible.
The ranges above are starting guidance. Unusually complex integrations, migrations, custom software, and paid platform subscriptions are scoped separately.
Questions before buying
If a project cannot be explained clearly before money changes hands, it is not ready to begin.
No. If the problem and boundary are already clear, we can scope a process build directly. The audit is useful when several problems compete for attention or the real bottleneck is uncertain.
No. Any third-party platform, model, connector, hosting, or subscription cost appears separately in the written scope so you can see the ongoing commitment.
Only when the approved build genuinely requires it, and only with explicit permission for the specific account and action. We prefer least-privilege access, test environments, and reversible changes.
Then we say so. A checklist, cleaner form, documented handoff, or ordinary automation is often more reliable than an AI layer. The business outcome chooses the tool.
The written scope identifies the deliverables, documentation, accounts, and any third-party dependencies. The goal is a system your business can understand and carry forward.
Yes. Monthly care is optional. A completed project should stand on its own with a clear owner, operating notes, and a recovery path.
Good fit
Contempo works best when the owner wants practical relief and is willing to make the real workflow visible.
Begin plainly
Bring that problem to a free 20-minute fit check. We will tell you whether Contempo can help and what the smallest sensible first step would be.